Independent Audit & Compliance

PARALLAXANALYTICS LTD

Independent, evidence-led audits of how information is represented, substantiated and governed.

  • AI Visibility
  • Legal & Regulatory Compliance
  • Information & Data Integrity

We examine how AI systems, digital platforms and public communications represent people, brands, products, organisations and claims. We identify which sources shape those representations, what is omitted or confused, and where legal, regulatory, reputational or information-integrity exposure may arise.

Three connected service pillars

We examine representation, supporting evidence and operational reality.

Each engagement is defined by the systems, sources, jurisdictions, languages and decision questions it covers. AI Visibility is one service line within a broader audit and compliance architecture.

01

AI Visibility Audits

Independent assessment of how selected AI systems discover, cite and describe an entity across relevant languages and contexts.

Example finding: an official source is omitted while secondary summaries shape the answer.

02

Legal & Regulatory Compliance Audits

Evidence-led review of public claims, disclosures, documentation and operational practice against the relevant regulatory context.

Example finding: a public claim extends beyond what the supporting disclosure or source record substantiates.

03

Information & Data Integrity Audits

Review of provenance, attribution, consistency and data-quality weaknesses across public information, digital platforms and evidence chains.

Example finding: distinct entities or sources are merged, producing contaminated attribution.

Problems we audit

Failures often appear between systems, not inside one document.

A1

Representation and source selection

Authoritative sources are omitted, entities are confused, or qualified information is reduced into misleading summaries.

A2

Claims and operational alignment

Websites, profiles, policies, disclosures and actual processes communicate materially different versions of the same position.

A3

Provenance, data quality and public exposure

Information is incomplete, stale, incorrectly attributed or disclosed without the context needed for reliable interpretation.

Our approach

A controlled engagement from defined scope to actionable findings.

Scope confirmation

We define and agree the entity, systems, jurisdictions, languages and decision question covered by the engagement.

Independent review

We examine the relevant public or authorised information against the agreed scope.

Findings and priorities

We present documented findings, material limitations and prioritised corrective actions.

Remediation support

Where agreed, we support controlled corrections to documentation, communication and information architecture.

Typical findings

Clear categories for explaining what failed and why it matters.

Official-source omission
An authoritative source is available but absent from the observed information path.
Entity or attribution error
Information is merged with, or assigned to, the wrong person, organisation, product or source.
Public-claim inconsistency
Materially different claims appear across channels, documents or language versions.
Regulatory or disclosure exposure
A public claim, disclosure or process may not align with the applicable regulatory context.
Provenance or data-quality weakness
The source, date, authorship, completeness or reliability of information cannot be established clearly.
Public security exposure
Public or authorised material reveals unnecessary operational, technical or organisational detail.
Evidence standard

Findings designed to be reviewed, challenged and acted on.

Material findings are connected to documented observations and relevant sources. We record the scope and date, distinguish observation from inference, and state uncertainty and limitations where they affect interpretation.

AI-system responses vary between runs and change over time. AI Visibility findings describe the systems as observed on the stated date and within the documented engagement scope.
  • Defined engagement scope and observation date
  • Relevant source references and documented findings
  • Observation, inference and uncertainty kept distinct
  • Prioritised corrective actions where appropriate
  • No guarantee of AI ranking, sales uplift or model-output control
About Parallax

Independent audit capability at the intersection of AI, public information and compliance.

Parallax Analytics Ltd is an independent audit and compliance firm operating internationally from Kraków. We work where AI representation, digital communication, regulatory documentation and information provenance intersect.

Scope boundaries

Clear limits are part of reliable audit work.

Legal and regulatory boundary

Audit findings and compliance diagnostics do not constitute legal advice. Parallax Analytics Ltd does not provide legal representation or other regulated legal services and does not replace advice from appropriately qualified legal counsel.

Security and outcome boundary

Security exposure findings are limited to public or authorised material. We do not perform penetration testing or active intrusion under this service scope. No AI ranking, commercial result or regulatory outcome is guaranteed.

Contact

Start with the system, entity or claim that needs examination.

Send a short outline of the problem, the relevant public channels and the decision you need the audit to support. We can confirm whether a controlled scope is appropriate.

Emailparallaxanalytics@proton.mePreferred initial contact
Phone — Poland+48 502 400 837Direct company contact
WhatsApp — UK+44 7475 179659Direct messaging
LinkedInParallax Analytics LtdCompany Page
X@ParallaxAnalytxCompany account
PrivacyRead the Privacy NoticeWebsite and correspondence data